<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question 2 isn&#8217;t good for Maine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marcpitman.com/2008/10/24/question-2-isnt-good-for-maine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marcpitman.com/2008/10/24/question-2-isnt-good-for-maine/</link>
	<description>Life&#039;s short. Live passionately.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://marcpitman.com/2008/10/24/question-2-isnt-good-for-maine/comment-page-1/#comment-8112</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcpitman.com/?p=663#comment-8112</guid>
		<description>Yep. You called it.

Thinking of fixing it tonight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. You called it.</p>
<p>Thinking of fixing it tonight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://marcpitman.com/2008/10/24/question-2-isnt-good-for-maine/comment-page-1/#comment-8111</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcpitman.com/?p=663#comment-8111</guid>
		<description>...blogslack detected....

last post....10.24.2008


...end of blog slacker detection module...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;blogslack detected&#8230;.</p>
<p>last post&#8230;.10.24.2008</p>
<p>&#8230;end of blog slacker detection module&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://marcpitman.com/2008/10/24/question-2-isnt-good-for-maine/comment-page-1/#comment-8107</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcpitman.com/?p=663#comment-8107</guid>
		<description>I read the act myself. I didn&#039;t see the 19 year old thing but the rest was quite clear. 

The casino rep as voting member on any board didn&#039;t limit it to a state agency either. 

Very scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the act myself. I didn&#8217;t see the 19 year old thing but the rest was quite clear. </p>
<p>The casino rep as voting member on any board didn&#8217;t limit it to a state agency either. </p>
<p>Very scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://marcpitman.com/2008/10/24/question-2-isnt-good-for-maine/comment-page-1/#comment-8106</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcpitman.com/?p=663#comment-8106</guid>
		<description>If what you quote is true, that is a huuuge  &amp; ambiguously gray area, which can be exploited , and not in favor of Maine&#039;s values.

Speaking of Maine&#039;s values, I&#039;m personally opposed to casinos, just because of what they are.

I would so much rather see some sort of manufacturing, or other life giving trade come into town.
I just don&#039;t see how having that sort of establishment would further the cause of the TYPE of vacationland we&#039;ve grown to love &amp; cherish.

MHO
Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If what you quote is true, that is a huuuge  &amp; ambiguously gray area, which can be exploited , and not in favor of Maine&#8217;s values.</p>
<p>Speaking of Maine&#8217;s values, I&#8217;m personally opposed to casinos, just because of what they are.</p>
<p>I would so much rather see some sort of manufacturing, or other life giving trade come into town.<br />
I just don&#8217;t see how having that sort of establishment would further the cause of the TYPE of vacationland we&#8217;ve grown to love &amp; cherish.</p>
<p>MHO<br />
Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhimm</title>
		<link>http://marcpitman.com/2008/10/24/question-2-isnt-good-for-maine/comment-page-1/#comment-8105</link>
		<dc:creator>jhimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcpitman.com/?p=663#comment-8105</guid>
		<description>yeah, i agree. the proposition in RI a few years ago was similarly, deeply flawed. even if i was pro-casinos, which, growing up in NJ with Atlantic City is a tough sell to begin with, there&#039;s no way RI&#039;s bill made any sense and it doesn&#039;t sound like the ME bill makes any sense, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i agree. the proposition in RI a few years ago was similarly, deeply flawed. even if i was pro-casinos, which, growing up in NJ with Atlantic City is a tough sell to begin with, there&#8217;s no way RI&#8217;s bill made any sense and it doesn&#8217;t sound like the ME bill makes any sense, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

